I disagree, It should be about both, the money and all other concerns. If you waste money, then you do not have enough to do other important environmental and social projects. This article does imply that a lot of money was wasted here. Surely corruption involved.

Thanks, didnt see yr reply until I posted mine. I saw they had to make adjustments to the roofs which increases the total costs.

La Planta Solar tendrá capacidad para generar 25 gigawatts hora anuales, lo que representa alrededor del 30% del consumo total de electricidad de la CEDA, lo que representa un ahorro directo para el Fideicomiso de la Central de Abasto (FICEDA), de 3.5 millones de pesos al año.

This is expensive. It should be done, today, for under $1.50. Still, it will produce energy at a cost of about 5 cents per kwh, or less than any coal or gas plant. All urban power generation should be solar and, if cleverly done, need very little new infrastructure or new substations.

Finally, Mexico City used an existing locale for a large power plant that takes up almost new space. If you can’t cheer about that, you might consider changing your brand of tequila.

This is expensive. It should be done, today, for unde4 $1.50. Still, it will produce energy at a cost of about 5 cents per kwh, or less than any coal or gas plant.

That being said, Mexico City used an existing locale for a large power plant that takes up almost new space. If you can’t cheer about that, you might consider changing your brand of tequila.